32863 Views 3 Replies Latest reply: Dec 7, 2009 6:06 PM by Amanda Levinson RSS
59 posts since
Jan 5, 2009
Currently Being Moderated

Dec 7, 2009 6:15 PM

Would you pay an additional annual fee or retainer to your primary care physician if it guaranteed more attentive care and enhanced access to your doctor?

Click on Reply (lower right corner), sign in or register to share your thoughts with the Policy 2.0 community.

  • 3 posts since
    Sep 17, 2009

    I wouldn't dismiss it, but I would have to been convinced that the extra value provided is worth the cost. What exactly would the "enhanced access" mean? I actually think my current level of care is quite good, but I might be willing to pay a nominal fee to be able to have more flexibility in scheduling appointments (early mornings, nights, and within the same week that I call to request an appointment).

  • 19 posts since
    Jan 5, 2009

    I'm opposed to paying more to a primary care physician on principle alone.  The health care plan I pay for should have PCPs treat all their patients equitably.  Adding another payment option to increase the level of attentiveness will only contribute to perverse incentives in the market for health care. And will create inequities in patient care.

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)