Health Care

5 Posts tagged with the health_reform tag
0

In its 2001 seminal report “Crossing the Quality Chasm:  A New Health System for the 21rst Century”, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) described the current state of health care delivery.  The report described a health care system that was fragmented, poorly designed and most importantly not delivering quality care. It also outlined a plan with very specific performance objectives designed to close the quality gap and support the patient-provider relationship. These objectives called for a radical redesign of the health system to achieve six aims—safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable care.  A new phase in health care improvement is now emerging: one that focuses on value. Value considers providing safe, effective, and efficient care at the right cost. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has developed a model for optimizing health, care experience, and costs for populations -- The Triple Aim. This is a structure in which we know and care about:

  1. Patient and Family experience,
  2. The quality of care delivered, and
  3. How our efforts impact the cost of care.

I would add from my own perspective that we care about our community and providing care for all.

My career started working as a nurse in a hospital system before I moved to the ambulatory care setting. As a nurse there are moments in my career that haunt me. These tragic events had catastrophic impact on patients and families. It was not the failure of caring and competent staff which led to these haunting memories--it was the lack of systems and process to support evidence based care. These experiences drive my passion for a healthier health care delivery system.

In my current position with Colorado Beacon Consortium as Director, Community Collaboratives and Practice Transformation, I have the pleasure of helping primary care practices in transformation and learning from their amazing efforts. In my 15 years working with primary care practices, I have never met a staff member clinical or non-clinical who came to work hoping not to deliver the best possible care. Practices need support for these transformational changes.  Having a “small test of change” fail has meaning for clinical staff because of our educational experience. Failure in the clinical training means that a patient is harmed. Clinical staff need to understand that failures in the quality improvement process mean that the team will not be wasting their time on processes that do not bring value to their patients or to the practice.

 

In an era of incentive programs such as Meaningful Use and system designs such as Accountable Care Organizations, now more than ever strong Primary Care delivery systems is necessary for creating a healthier health care system. Primary Care transformation is integral is achieving the goals articulated in Crossing the Quality Chasm.

 

Now more than ever Primary Care needs support to transform systems and processes to make their best better. Redesign efforts started with the development of the Chronic Care Model by Dr. Edward Wagner and the MacColl Institute. The Chronic Care Model serves as a structure to organize care delivery for patients with chronic disease by maximizing proactive team based care, implementing processes which deliver evidence based care, utilizing health information technology (HIT) and delivering proactive care. Through several national organizations such as Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Health Disparities Collaboratives, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), the MacColl Institute and more recent initiatives such as National Demonstration Project and Improving Performance in Practice (IPIP) best practices in primary care transformation have been developed.

The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) has been recognized as a catalyst to support Primary Care transformation that delivers on the expectations described in Crossing the Quality Chasm. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) describes PCMH as:

  • Patient-Centered
  • Comprehensive  & Coordinated care
  • Superb access to care
  • A systems-based approach to quality and safety

These attributes must be supported by a foundation of Health Information Technology and rich data which provides knowledge to drive outcomes.  The other structural change must come in the form of a payment structure that supports primary care and the attributes that will drive the value primary care delivery will bring to healthcare.

A comprehensive program to recognize practices who implement the attributes of PCMH has been developed by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Physician Practice Connections- Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH). NCQA has recently updated the recognition program.

The 2011 program includes the core components of primary care:

  • PCMH 1: Enhance Access and Continuity
  • PCMH 2: Identify and Manage Patient Populations
  • PCMH 3: Plan and Manage Care
  • PCMH 4: Provide Self-Care and Community Support
  • PCMH 5: Track and Coordinate Care
  • PCMH 6: Measure and Improve Performance

The transformation process for primary care is more than tinkering around the edges. This process of change requires a foundation of culture and leadership that is supportive of the efforts within the practice. This can be either through the leadership structure of a broader organization or within a small independent primary care practice. The Primary Care Practice team members are being asked to reconsider the hierarchical nature of medicine for a team based approach to patient-centered care. All members of the team to participate in the redesign process and in evidence based care delivery. Practices establish structures to make “small tests of change” that are reviewed to understand if the impact is positive in delivering safe, effective, evidence based care.  Implementing self-management support with primary care builds on the most intimate of relationships between patient & families and the care team. Self-management techniques utilized in the care setting build on patient activation and engagement in their care. Technology is a tool to be maximized and utilized meaningfully.

 

Clearly, we understand the role of Primary Care in supporting our current sick health care system to become healthier. This transformation takes time and requires support. As we establish principles, goals, care models and incentive programs to create a healthy health care system, it is important not to lose sight of the need to also transform the current payment model with is perfectly designed to assure that our fragmented, ineffective, dysfunctional and harmful health care system continues.

 

Crossing the Quality Chasm

http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm-A-New-Health-System-for-the-21st-Century.aspx

Institute for Healthcare Improvement

http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/StrategicInitiatives/IHITripleAim.htm

 

Improving Chronic Illness Care

http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/

HRSA Healthcare Communities

http://www.healthcarecommunities.org/

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

http://www.pcmh.ahrq.gov/portal/server.pt/community/pcmh__home/1483/what_is_pcmh_

National Committee for Quality Assurance

http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/631/default.aspx

Office of the National Coordinator for HIT (ONC)

http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__home/1204

Colorado Beacon Consortium

http://www.coloradobeaconconsortium.org/

Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)

https://www.cms.gov/EHRIncentivePrograms/30_Meaningful_Use.asp

Partnership with Patients

http://www.healthcare.gov/center/programs/partnership/index.html

0

Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter has announced in a speech earlier this month plans for a $16-million collaborative primary care clinic in Queens County. The overarching goal is to bring Better Care Sooner to Nova Scotia residents by reshaping how emergency care is delivered.

 

The collaborative care clinic will have space for five  family  physicians, a nurse practitioner, family practice nurses and  other  health professionals.The new plans also call for an upgraded 22-bed  inpatient unit.

 

Additionally the Better Care Sooner is poised to:

 

-improve access to primary care, especially in smaller communities.

-make emergency care more patient-centered and streamlined.

-provide care that is better tailored to those whose needs are more complex (i.e. seniors).

-increase public awareness of 911 and the healthlink nurse line 811.

-make changes to the way health care is funded (reward better, patient-centered care).

 

The government states that roughly 84 percent of ER visits at the hospital would be better addressed by primary care.

 

Dexter says the province is committing $2.5 million to the project while the Region of Queens Municipality has committed $1 million.

About $11 million comes from the Queens Foundation and private donors, and another $1.5 million still needs to be raised.

 

 

Check out the whole story at http://www.canadaviews.ca/2010/12/23/improvements-will-ease-er-overcrowding-access-to-care/

1

The health care reform establishes a Prevention and Public Health Fund, starting with a $500 million dollar appropriation in 2010, rising to $2 billion per year starting in 2015.  How should this money be spent?  Robert Gould (President & CEO, Partnership for Prevention) thinks it should target one major health issue, rather than being spread ineffectually across many worthy causes.  His pick:  tobacco.  He puts his case forward in Kaiser Health News.

 

Is he right?  What about other critical population health issues like obesity?  Should the fund concentrate on one issue at a time?  And if so, how do we know when that issue is "fixed", so that we can move on to the next big need?

 

What do you think?

0

Could? How about, almost definitely.  Even before legislation passed, many Americans were unable to obtain a timely appointment due a shortage of primary care physicians in their local communities.  An estimated 60 million Americans, or one in five,  were reported to lack adequate access to primary care. This results in patients increasingly turning to costly emergency room visits to obtain the routine care they should be receiving from their primary care provider, and reduced availability to emergency services for those who need it most. Since proposing legislation that would expand access to our nation's uninsured, many experts have warned that the need for primary care will also grow dramatically once an individual mandate to carry health coverage is implemented. Even without the mandate, our increasing aging population and spiraling levels of chronic condition prevalence will further stress the current primary care shortage and potentially threaten the long-term fiscal sustainability of our national health care system.

 

But don't take my word for it, check out what the Shots blog, from National Public Radio has to say.

0

I mentioned a couple of the differences between the House and Senate Health reforms bills in my last Senate Health Bill Estimated to Cost $849 Billion And is Estimated to Reduce Deficits by $127 Billion by 2019. , however I came across a more extensive comparison on Speaker Pelosi's blog, The Gavel:

DEFICIT REDUCTION

According to the latest CBO analysis of deficit reduction, the House bill reduces the deficit by $139 billion in the first 10 years, and by as much as $650 billion in the second 10 years.

According to the latest CBO analysis of deficit reduction, the Senate bill reduces the deficit by $130 billion in the first 10 years, and by about $650 billion in the second 10 years.

COVERAGE

The House bill covers 36 million currently uninsured Americans.

The Senate bill covers 31 million currently uninsured Americans.

EFFECTIVE DATES

Under the House bill, major coverage provisions go into effect in 2013.

Under the Senate bill, major coverage provisions go into effect in 2014.

SENIORS

The House bill fully closes the prescription drug donut hole for seniors.

The Senate bill does not fully close the prescription drug donut hole for seniors.

MIDDLE CLASS AFFORDABILITY

The House bill lowers premiums and cost sharing for the middle class through 25 percent more generous affordability credits for the average person going into the Exchange.

PROMOTING COMPETITION & THE PUBLIC OPTION

The House bill offers a public health insurance option nationwide to promote competition.

The Senate bill also contains a public option but allows states to opt-out.

The House bill eliminates the health insurance company anti-trust exemption.

The Senate bill does not eliminate the health insurance company anti-trust exemption.

EMPLOYER-SPONSORED INSURANCE COVERAGE

The House bill increases enrollment in private employer-provided coverage by 6 million Americans.

The Senate bill reduces employer-sponsored coverage by 5 million Americans. (These individuals will go into the Exchange because their employers dropped coverage.)

PAYING FOR REFORM

The House and Senate bills take different approaches on paying for reform. TheHouse bill includes a surcharge on income above $500,000 for an individual and $1 million for couples. Payfors in the House bill are strongly supported by the American people–a new AP poll found 57 percent support a surcharge on those earning more than $250,000 per year to help pay for health care.

Which bill do you support? Share your thoughts by signing in or registering for a Policy 2.0 account.