Health Care

3 Posts tagged with the education tag
0

One of the pillars of Hope Street Group's strategic recommendations to reinvent primary care may have a harder time being realized based on recent events. Funding for Primary Care GME  has become a potential target in the deficit reduction process. Hope Street Group believes that it is essential to recruit, train and retain the optimal primary care work force.

 

The future U.S. workforce should reflect the re-orientation toward national health outcomes over delivery and identify ways to optimize each health worker’s role to achieve better results. We should provide renewed support for the “highest and best” use of each health care professional’s skill set so that providers are using their training to its maximum value to the health system.  This more effective division of labor frees physicians to manage higher-acuity patients, capitalizing on the distinct differences in training while safely and effectively delivering care through an interdisciplinary team-based approach.

 

Read more about the topic here:http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/government-medicine/20110719gmefunding.html

0

The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health report compiled by the  Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing at the Institute of Medicine (IOM) was released in October 2010.  The report has generated lively discussions from multiple disciplines about scope of practice, educational preparation and training, and leadership roles of nurses at all levels.  Eight recommendations are included in the report:

 

1.     Remove scope-of-practice barriers.

2.     Expand opportunities for nurses to lead and diffuse collabora¬tive improvement efforts.

3.     Implement nurse residency programs.

4.     Increase the proportion of nurses with a baccalaureate degree to 80 percent by 2020.

5.     Double the number of nurses with a doctorate by 2020.

6.     Ensure that nurses engage in lifelong learning.

7.     Prepare and enable nurses to lead change to advance health.

8.     Build an infrastructure for the collection and analysis of inter¬professional health care workforce data. (http://iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing/Future%20of%20Nursing%202010%20Recommendations.pdf)

 

I will comment on Number 5 which addresses doubling the number of nurses with a doctorate by 2020 – the research PhD and the clinical Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP).  Questions that are commonly asked about DNP preparation include: (1) Why should there be a shift to doctoral preparation for advanced practice nurses (APNs)? (2) Will master’s prepared nurses no longer be qualified to continue to provide services as APNs? (3) If the goal is to address the primary care shortage, how does extending training achieve that? (4) Will increasing the debt load of potential providers but not the income generate the same specialization migration that has plagued physicians?  Quick responses are: (1) The time has come; (2) No, this change will not disenfranchise currently licensed and certified APNs; (3) APNs will have a value-added skill set to help improve quality of care and health outcomes; (4) Specialization will not become the norm.

 

The DNP degree is designed to prepare advanced practice nurses with increased value-added skills in leadership, systems thinking, evidence-based practice, health care policy, health information technology, and population health.  Current master’s curricula are already overloaded with trying to provide all of these essential inputs to creating the optimal nursing workforce.  Adding more credits to include mandatory content in basic curricula is not realistic.  Graduates are expected to demonstrate competencies in broad areas reflecting the increasing complexity of care delivery.  Many master’s programs are beyond 60 credits now; on average, students take 2 years full-time and 3-5 years part time to earn a master’s degree.  The DNP is 2 years post-masters and 3 years post baccalaureate for full-time study.  The trade off of a few more months in school for a more highly prepared APN should not even be a point for discussion.  APNs will still be prepared at the master’s level unless the DNP becomes entry level to practice by 2015, as recommended by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN).

 

Many nurses have not entered doctoral studies because they were not interested in pursuing research careers; the DNP degree provides an option for those who want to earn a final degree in nursing.  The investment of time and money does pose challenges for nurses who are working full-time and have multiple other life responsibilities.  Personal motivation is a major driving force for APNs who do enroll in DNP programs.  DNP programs have been attractive to nurses from diverse backgrounds – primary care and specialty care, rural and urban settings, and the experienced and the novice.  A number of APNs already work in specialty practices and emerging changes in APN educational preparation through the Consensus agreement (http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Education/pdf/APRNReport.pdf) creates more standardized curricula, education and training, for all APNs.  The number of APN graduates who might opt for specialties instead of primary care probably will not increase in most areas of practice.  Opportunities for clinical faculty positions in academic institutions secondary to the nursing faculty shortage is another driving force encouraging enrollments in DNP programs.  As the DNP role becomes more defined, the value of their added skills will be recognized, and compensation will follow accordingly.

 

The IOM report offers strategies for achieving greater numbers of nurses with doctoral degrees.  Two main actions required from schools of nursing are to review current curricula and revise to make progression from basic preparation to more advanced degrees a more seamless process and to obtain increased levels of financial assistance from private and government sources.  Without addressing these two areas, especially in tough economic times, preparing nurses at any level becomes increasingly difficult.

 

Downloadable free copy of full report: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/The-Future-of-Nursing-Leading-Change-Advancing-Health.aspx.

Burman et al. (2005): http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/content/14/6/463.full.pdf+html

Newland (2011): http://journals.lww.com/tnpj/Fulltext/2011/04000/The_Doctor_of_Nursing_Practice__What_are_your.1.aspx

Miller (2008): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2605113/

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2009): http://www.aacn.nche.edu/DNP/DNPFAQ.htm

Clinton & Sperhac (2009): http://www.con.ohio-state.edu/attachments/Doctoral_programs/DNP_Issues_and_Consequences_article.pdf

Barry (2009): http://www.nursingcenter.com/library/JournalArticle.asp?Article_ID=856423

0

Nursing  Modernizes to Reflect Modern Times

 

As health care evolves, so has the nursing profession.  Advanced Practice Registered Nursing (APRN),  an umbrella term to include the 4 roles of advanced practice nurses, have been expanding at a rapid rate.    There are over 250,500 APRNs in the country, according to the recently released HRSA report on the nation’s nursing workforce, in 2008, there were:

1) 174,300 Nurse Practitioners

2) 18,500 Nurse Midwives

3) 35,000 Nurse Anesthetists

4) 59,000 Clinical Nurse Specialists.

 

Landmark reports including the IOM’s Crossing the Quality Chasm and it’s follow up, Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality, emphatically recommended that a modern well-functioning health care workforce must be prepared to deliver patient-centered care as members of an interdisciplinary team, emphasizing evidence-based practice, quality improvement innovation, outcomes results and informatics.

 

Advanced Practice Nurses Evolve to the Doctoral Level

The American Association of Colleges of Nursing developed a consensus process to address the nursing profession’s current practice of preparing advanced practice nurses in master’s degree programs as no longer adequate to meet modern complexity and demands.   A roadmap to adopt the position that all advanced practice nursing programs will move  to the doctorate of nursing practice (DNP) by 2015.  This curriculum is intended to propel nursing practice forward and keep it grounded in the practice domain.  Historically, nurses were often earning PhDs with a focus on generating new knowledge.  What was missing was an expert clinician to provide leadership and could translate and infuse evidence into care delivery systems.    A clinical doctorate would address the growing complexity of health care,  compounded by an escalating demand for services, burgeoning growth in scientific knowledge, and the increasing sophistication in technology. The nursing profession recognizes that in order to transform health care delivery, we must recognize the critical need for clinicians to lead, design, evaluate, and continually improve the context within which care is delivered.   Picture an expert nurse practitioner who can also lead quality improvement efforts,  build programs to help all providers practicing within the context of an evidence-base,  effect cultural change, and engage in executive level decision-making in large, complex health care institutions.  A DNP will create a highly qualified APRN to meet evolving models of care delivery that focus on outcomes, a nurse practitioner on steroids, if you will.

 

National  APRN Standards are Established. 

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing has internally modernized their standards across a range of issues by creating an advanced practice nursing regulatory model.  It requires all APRN programs follow clear, consistent curriculum guidelines with rigorous accreditation standards, that state licensing boards develop standard requirements for APRN licensure, and that educational programs are standard across the 4 APRN roles.  It boldly states that the hodge-podge of nurse practice  acts across  the nation, over half of which are restrictive, must be removed.  It recommends that solely boards of  nursing regulate advanced practice nurses – which is not the norm in some states.   For example, some states require boards of medicine to regulate or co-regulate advanced nursing practice.   The profession has set new standards and many states are not in compliance with them.  Some states, such as Virginia, have a restrictive practice act, which had not been modernized since the 1970s,  creating unnecessary practice restrictions in a time of dire need and workforce shortages.   [The report, APRN Consensus, is found below]

 

 

IOM Focuses on Nursing’s Future

 

Last fall the IOM released, The Future of Nursing, which makes several bold recommendations.  The report is based on 4 key principles: 1) Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training; 2) Nurses should achieve higher levels of education and training through an improved education system that promotes seamless academic progression. 3) Nurses should be full partners, with physicians and other health professionals, in redesigning health care in the United States; and 4) Effective workforce planning and policy making require better data collection and an improved information infrastructure.  The report recommends that the number of nurses with a doctorate be doubled by 2020 so that nurses are prepared to lead and improve collaborative health care improvement efforts. In order to do this, the report strongly urges all levels of government to remove regulatory barriers to practice.   One strategy  the IOM recommends is to have Congress limit federal funding for nursing education to states that have not adopted the model rules and regulations described above.

 

All to say, the times they are a changing.  Modern nursing practice has adapted to the surge in chronicity,  the broad mandate to make threshold improvements in patient safety, care transitions and quality of care.  Advanced practice nurses with doctorates in nursing practice are prepared to lead the way.   In this time of transformation, if the health  professions stay fixed, immutable, and non-adaptive to the changing landscape, we can expect more of the same bleak health care outcomes, unsafe practices, and out of control health care inflation.  

 

Dr. Eileen O’Grady is a Certified Nurse Practitioner and Wellness Coach and teaches health policy at Pace University’s DNP program.   She earned a PhD and wishes she had a DNP degree.    www.eileenogrady.net

 

 

 

Sources:


American Association of Colleges of Nursing. DNP Roadmap Taskforce Report.  http://www.aacn.nche.edu/dnp/pdf/DNProadmapreport.pd

 

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing: Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification & Education  http://www.nonpf.com/associations/10789/files/APRNConsensusModelFinal09.pdf

 

IOM: The Future Of Nursing Report    http://thefutureofnursing.org/recommendations

 

The National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses (2008)   http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/rnsurvey/2008/nssrn2008.pdf