0

We are currently challenged by a healthcare system problem. Too often patients only communicate with their provider to receive episodic care; we need to emphasize the importance of the provider-patient relationship in preventative care.

 

The election of President Obama in November 2008 marked the beginning of the health reform era in the United States. Since his election, several legislation, including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and the Health Information Technology Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act), have been passed to address the inefficiencies and depreciating quality of health care delivery within our health care system. The underlying costs of the healthcare system are exploding. Our nation currently boasts a health care GDP of nearly 17%[i] and an uninsured population of over 50 million (which includes an estimated 10 million non-citizens).

 

Whether we argue that health expenditures or inefficient quality are responsible for increased healthcare spending and disparate health outcomes, our current performance on economic and health quality indicators show a need for reform. But can we achieve healthcare reform without including patients at the table?

 

Patients remain the most underutilized resource in our health care system. If we want to optimize prevention and wellness, we must improve patient involvement and understanding of their health care. Health reform and embracing new technologies won’t be successful if patients aren’t engaged.

 

Why patient engagement?

 

Patient engagement is the process of involving patients in the management of their health care in order to satisfy their healthcare needs.  Examples of patient engagement include documenting patient preferences, discussing healthy lifestyle behaviors, and the use of new technologies, like patient portals, to facilitate patient-provider communication.

 

It is important that we look to patients as partners in their health care management, and not placing prejudice on their ability to understand “just what the doctor ordered.”

 

One of the recommendations from the Using Open Innovation to Reinvent Primary Care project addresses the need to engage patients and hold them accountable for the management of their healthcare. Similarly, at Working Together Towards a Healthier Generation: The Implementation of Health Reform, the Metropolitan Washington Public Health Association’s 2011 Annual Meeting, Dr. Mohammad Akhter, Director of the District of Columbia’s Department of Public Health, spoke about the need for patients to understand what health care reform means to them.

 

This requires a cultural shift where the patient, in collaboration with the physician, takes the initiative in managing his/her care.

 

Just because health reform promises to place a health insurance card in the hand of every citizen and documented person does not guarantee that patients will use this coverage. Health insurance coverage without patient engagement will not lead to the outcomes we hope to see (i.e. better care coordination, controlled hemoglobin A1Cs, etc.) As the old adage goes, “you can bring a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink…”

Recognizing the importance of patient engagement in care delivery, there are a number of tools being introduced to help transform the way we deliver care. Recent discussions celebrate the use of mobile or software applications to facilitate ongoing communication between the patient and health care provider. Whether we rely on the use of mobile applications of electronic records, the use of technology provides an opportunity to merge the disparate words of health IT and patient engagement in care delivery.

 

What’s all this about health information technology?

 

E-health technologies, such as the electronic health record, can improve patient engagement. The electronic health record is a longitudinal archive of a patient’s medical history. It has the ability to offer providers immediate access to their patients’ medical records. Empirical data on the clinical effectiveness of the electronic health record suggests that this technology can help improve care coordination between providers caring for the same patient and ensure that providers educate their patients with up-to-date, relevant information on managing their care (see reference links below).

 

E-health technologies, if implemented, can transform the way health care is currently delivered by vastly improving health providers’ ability to involve patients in the care management process.

 

Reference Articles

1. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin RE, Graziano F, Chan CL (1999) Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med 16(1):1-9.

2. Poon EG, Keohane CA, Yoon CS, et al. (2010) Effect of Bar-Code Technology on the Safety of Medication Administration New England Journal of Medicine 362:1698-1707.

3. Resnick HE, Alwan M (2010) Use of health information technology in home health and hospice agencies: United States, 2007 Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 17(4):389-395.

4. Zaia AH, Grant RW, Esteya G, Lestera WT, Andrews CT, Yeea R, Mortd E, Chueha HC. 2008. The Practice of Informatics Application of Information Technology Lessons from Implementing a Combined Workflow–Informatics System for Diabetes Management. JAMIA. 15:524-533.

5. Kwok R, Dinh M, Dinh D, Chu M (2009) Improving adherence to asthma clinical guidelines and discharge documentation from emergency departments: implementation of a dynamic and integrated electronic decision support system. Emerg Med Australas. 21(1):31-7.


[i] “Two Myths about the American health care system.” Montreal Economic Institute. June 2005. Retrieved 2011-04-15.

0

Where does the healthcare continuum really begin?

 

With prevention?

In the home?

With the Primary Care Provider?

In the Emergency Department?

 

Although an argument can certainly be made for any of the four choices above, I’d like to challenge your opinion and perspective with a different answer…the continuum for many begins with Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

This past year I had the privilege to be included in two standard setting and forward thinking discussion forums-- AHRQ’s 2010 Annual Conference and HCIE Innovators Event as well as Hope Street Group’s Policy 2.0: Using Open Innovation to Reinvent Primary Care Project. Both of these events offered diverse perspectives from diverse participants in academia, corporations and all levels of government and localities who gathered to discuss and make recommendations to improve the health care system. Interestingly, the first responder perspective of EMS was only a footnote in these discussions. I believe that policy makers and leaders within healthcare all too often fail to look outside their sphere of influence and familiarity for answers or more importantly the critical questions. That said, I know this minimalization was not intended or planned, but a result of historical processes and comfort levels.

 

The numbers…

EMS contributes 15% or 17.25 million patients to the nations 123.8 million annual Emergency Department (ED) visits (CDC, 2008), yet Fire, EMS or Law Enforcement respond to over 240 million 911 calls per year (NENA, 2009). It’s difficult to accurately breakdown the national percentages of 911 call types, but upwards of 60% of EMS calls are generally considered low-acuity or non-emergent. To put this into a local perspective, the City of Tucson AZ with a population of approximately 530,000 (2005) generates approx. 79,000 Fire and EMS 911 calls per year, 84% or ~67,000 of these are medical in nature and 60% of those, ~46,000 require only Basic Life Support (BLS) care (TFD, 2009).

 

So what does that really mean? It means that the 911 system provides a substantial safety net for the Nation’s healthcare system. While this should come as no surprise, the volume of patients utilizing EMS, Emergency Departments and the 911 system continues to grow. Over 15 years ago, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Health Resources and Services Administration joined with leaders from the EMS community to put forth an EMS plan that would require significant collaboration with acute care, primary care and public health. This provided one of the earliest, nationwide, use of the scale-up-and spread model and was published as the1996 EMS Agenda for the Future (NHTSA, 1996).

 

The past…

To implement that vision and professional template, EMS has continued to grow it’s service provision model from one that was historically created for stabilization and transport of the acutely ill and injured; one that was set-up to intervene only when patients needed emergent support; one that operated in relative isolation from other health care and community resources; one that was not involved in the business of ensuring social service follow-up and one that did not have a working knowledge of community health care providers and regional health care organizations (NHTSA, 1996).

The present…

Today, EMS is integrated with other health care providers, public health and public safety agencies to provide community-based healthcare and management. EMS agencies and providers are involved in activities related to prevention education, illness and injury risk, acute illness and injury care, follow-up, treatment of chronic conditions and community health monitoring. This vision is also shared by the Injury Response Division of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (NCIPC/CDC) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) who have called for a better understanding of roles and collaboration between Public Health and EMS through their Appleseed Project initiative (CDC, 2004).

 

The reality …

As you can see, EMS has developed into more than a group of fire departments, rescue services and ambulance companies. While providing these additional and collaborative services, EMS remains the public’s emergency medical safety net.  Looking back to those 240 million 911 calls and the 17.25 million EMS-to-ED admissions, it’s clear that a significant amount of health assessment, care and triage occurs outside the hospital walls. In fact, there are no other healthcare providers that see patients in their own home or living environment quite like EMS. The “scene assessment” which is a fundamental EMS skill reveals more information about a person, their living conditions, their health, their support system and their coping mechanisms than any other assessment tool.  How many Primary Care providers, case managers or health plan administrators have this perspective into their own patient’s lives?

 

From where I sit with over 30 years of experience as an RN in Maternal-Child Health and EMS, I see several important questions that need further discussion and clarification before we can begin to understand how to move forward in improving the healthcare of our Nation.

 

  • How can we better educate individuals to utilize the 911 system for acuity appropriate reasons?
  • How do we encourage the use of Primary Care practitioners for non-emergent and urgent medical and injury complaints instead of defaulting to the approach of “if this is a medical emergency, please hang up and dial 911?
  • How do we share the burden of after-hours and weekend low-acuity patient needs?
  • How do we facilitate better communication and collaboration between EMS, public health, acute and chronic care case management, behavioral health and community services?
  • How do we move patients calling 911 for non-emergent or non-healthcare reasons into a public or human services system that will better meet their needs?

Communication, collaboration, connectivity, consistency and caring are all functions of healthcare, yet as the patient numbers and range of patient complaints increase, we all need to utilize each others skills, knowledge and expertise to meet the needs of our patient population. Reaching out to our colleagues may be the first step toward improvement, integration and understanding of our healthcare system.

 

http://www.911dispatch.com/info/fact_figures.html

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/nhamcs_emergency/nhamcsed2008.pdf

http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/imported/data/demographic/eecpop00_05.pdf

http://www.nena.org/911-statistics

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/publications/index.html

http://www.nremt.org/nremt/about/emsAgendaFuture.asp

http://www.tucsonaz.gov/fire/AnnualReport.pdf

0

I always inform new patients about the personal philosophy that guides my practice as a family nurse practitioner in primary care and determines how I approach patients, families, and health.  Revealing this early helps patients decide whether I might be the right health professional to manage their unique health care needs.  When I firmly state, “I am not responsible for your health, you are!” many will stare open-mouthed and ask, “But you are the medical person so how can I be the one responsible?”   I reply, “I am not with you 24/7 so how can I be responsible for the behaviors and practices that contribute to your overall health and well-being?”  This I-You exchange can be confusing.  Patients are often under the misconception that the health care professional has control when in reality they are in control, especially if they are living in the community and make their own decisions about other aspects of their lives.  I go on to stress that I am a partner, and my responsibility is to help them acquire the knowledge, skills, and confidence they need to manage their health to the best of their ability.

 

In Using Open Innovation to Reinvent Primary Care, the fifth recommendation from the Hope Street Group addresses empowering the consumer to take personal responsibility for improving their health.  Several strategies suggested to achieve this are more global than interactions in individual provider-patient relationships.  One reason I left critical care nursing and became an advanced practice nurse in primary care was to work with patients who had the capacity, ability, and power to be active participants in the decision-making process concerning individual and family health and the care received.

 

Many chronic health conditions affecting Americans are related to lifestyle behaviors and choices.  Empowering patients to take personal responsibility begins with the provider relinquishing their perceived control and giving the patient that authority.