The health care reform establishes a Prevention and Public Health Fund, starting with a $500 million dollar appropriation in 2010, rising to $2 billion per year starting in 2015. How should this money be spent? Robert Gould (President & CEO, Partnership for Prevention) thinks it should target one major health issue, rather than being spread ineffectually across many worthy causes. His pick: tobacco. He puts his case forward in Kaiser Health News.
Is he right? What about other critical population health issues like obesity? Should the fund concentrate on one issue at a time? And if so, how do we know when that issue is "fixed", so that we can move on to the next big need?
What do you think?
Like
(0)






