During our work on “Policy 2.0: Using Open Innovation to Reform Teacher Evaluation Systems,” the policy team heard from quite a few folks that we ought to think beyond classroom performance to pre-service indicators and differentiating among teacher preparation programs. They’re right.
Personally, I’m of the opinion that even the ideal set of pre-service indicators wouldn’t be a silver bullet – witness pro sports drafts. There are enough 1st round duds and come-from-nowhere heroes to make me wary of relying too much on pre-service stats.
That doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be doing better, and differentiating among teacher preparation programs is a great place to start. Louisiana has been out ahead on this, and it looks like Florida is launching a new initiative.
How do I think you make it work? Include common sense checks and qualitative assessment. Especially as a program like this is getting started, I think it’s worth the money to have people on the ground backing up statistics about student achievement gains with qualitative observations.
Ensure a reasonable distribution among rating categories – labels are useless if quality within the same category varies dramatically. See New York City’s school progress reports and teacher evaluation as a whole for cautionary tales.
Educate the public and stakeholder groups with thoughtful, careful leadership. Differentiating among teacher preparation programs can be thornier than one might assume. Institutions of higher education have long histories and fierce pride. Leadership that can bring everyone to the table around common goals will increase the chances of meaningful and positive change.
What do you think is important when it comes to differentiating among teacher preparation programs? Register or Login to add your comment below!