Hope Street Group

7 Posts tagged with the social_media tag
0

Numbers feast

Posted by Vance Hickin Jan 13, 2009

Adam Singer at TheFutureBuzz takes a moment to index some jaw-dropping statistics around the leaders in the Internet space, social media and Web 2.0.

 

Among the most interesting:

 


    $110,000,000 - approximate amount of money lost by Google annually due to the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button

    260 - the number of languages articles have been written in on Wikipedia

    77% - percentage of active Internet users who read blogs

    100 - number of friends the average user has (on Facebook)

(That last item can only have grown since it was sourced; and just think of the exponential growth this networking represents.  A factor of 100 on every customer?  That'll get the job done, and then some.)

 

All this may not be too surprising given the ubiquity of the Web these days, but keep in mind, 15 years ago, we were still using phone modems and a Graphical User Interface was nascent and only rendering local software. Food for thought.

0

If you've not yet been reduced to instant-messagespeak or simply don't recognize every possible acronym, maybe you don't suffer from "too much information" the way government seems to fear it may.

 

Writing at PBS' MediaShift, Mark Drapeau posts a thorough analysis of the role social media is playing in how officials are dealing with communications, given the explosion of online tools and adoption among their constituencies.

 

I wasn't aware of the dust-up (h/t Drapeau), apparently beginning in the summer of 2008, when a Republican and Democratic congressman each took heat for having utilized services like Twitter (for micro-blogging) and Qik (for mobile video) to speak to their employers, the American people.

 

The hesitation seems understandable (and this story's now a tad dated; last summer seems like one of the 'zoic eras of long ago), but as we careen toward friending the President-elect on Facebook and all that entails, it's helpful to note that this hand-wringing occured during the most recent sessions of Congress.

 

The tension comes from the most delicate matters of public record being balanced with the tremendous scale enabled by the Web.  I'm hoping We the people find the upsides greatly outweigh the downsides.

 

Less than two weeks from the launch of what may be the most interactive government in history, netizens are hopeful the online kinetics of the campaign will translate to better government. But as I've suggested before, time will tell.

0

As we await word on what - exactly - the Obama administration plans to do with the interactive war chest it built during the campaign (names, personal data and a certain passion quotient which everyone's clamoring to galvanize), it's interesting to see the sequence in which two-way communications tools are released at the current platform, change.gov.

 

The transition announced Open for Questions yesterday (h/t Sam Stein at HuffPo), which is a simple but elegant interface inviting questions to the incoming administration, a vote-up-or-down feature for logged-in users, and presumably in the future, a response from the government.

 

That's the trick, right? We're not exactly lacking in tools and platforms for idea generation.  The opportunity to do so on a site offered by the next President is a great next step.  But how confident can we be that main street thinking might penetrate the executive branch fortress?  How likely is a well-articulated question or idea to make it to real decisionmakers in Washington?

 

Only time will tell.  But more wind supplied by a fresh front of air blowing into the nation's capital.  Let's hope it doesn't get usurped by the existing "high-pressure system."

0

Francine Hardaway chronicles her social experiment during the holiday downtime - inviting members of her various social networks to attend a policy discussion in her home.  The issue?  No small matter - health care policy and what we (the people) can do about it.

 

The meeting seems to provide further evidence that online tools and the networks they spawn can grease the wheels of interaction.  But as the discussion highlights indicate, tackling issues of this magnitude and funneling opportunities for improvements to real decisionmakers will take both systemic and attitudinal change.  Is Washington listening? Hear, hear.

0

Social media in education

Posted by Vance Hickin Dec 23, 2008

No shortage of speculation and grandiose designs in the area of social media these days, but as we look at how to shape education policy using these types of collaborative tools, it's instructive to think about how the actual business of educating is already taking advantage of the new technologies and techniques.

 

Christopher Dawson over at ZDNet posts usefully on a great series of podcasts from a student at City University of New York.  Well worth a listen during your holiday downtime.

    The take-home message? If social media aren’t changing the way educational content is delivered at your institution, they probably should be. Even if you haven’t jumped on the Web 2.0 bandwagon, there is quite a bit here to feed our thinking about how to modify our curricula using those "21st Century Tools".

0

2.0? Let's get on with it

Posted by Vance Hickin Dec 16, 2008

The post-election, pre-Inauguration period has given us a chance to review our recent past and look forward (gulp) to the challenges ahead.  It's at once daunting and exhilarating.

 

Historians will comb over the winning and losing election strategies, and strategists will look to build on successes or reverse negative trends, but the real across-the-board game changer is the heightened interest in civic participation brought forth by these times.

 

As citizens, we're now looking to the new administration to practice what it preached on the stump, and hoping it can harness this overflowing enthusiasm in the service of effective and efficient government.  Emblematic of this "new way" of doing things are the tremendous advances in interactive tools and the unprecedented ways in which they have been applied to generate real-world results.  Web 2.0 tools and the two-way conversations they foster have surely changed the civic landscape - but their advantages have been limited thus far beyond election cycles and advocacy for various causes.

 

The time is now for the wisdom and scalability of 2.0 tools to be applied directly to the problems that most need solving. Steve Radick writes in no uncertain terms that the time for theory and pontification has passed, and that government needs to jump headlong into the pool of possibilities:

 

Our time is now. It’s time to start doing. If you work for the federal government or for a government contractor, there are opportunities galore for you. If you’re sitting in your cubicle reading this, just counting the minutes till you can leave for the day, this is your chance. Social media and the government is your opportunity to stand out and do something to effect real change in our government.

 

It's hard to argue with the logic, but it remains to be seen whether the massive ship that is the United States can turn nimbly on instructions for evasive action.

 

So perhaps we should be listening even more closely to the pioneers of distributed publishing and online communities - the people who were thinking in terms of scale and service to the community before it was given a handy moniker.

 

Writing recently at Huffington Post, craigslist founder Craig Newmark takes note of the various tools already available to both government and the engaged citizenry and makes a series of suggestions to get the ball rolling.

 

Movements clearly need tools, but so too do tools need practical real-world applications to realize their potential. Newmark's approach is the right one - identifying existing platforms that offer scalable organizing and message dissemination and making them the proving ground for problem-solving of pressing issues.

 

There's no one-stop-shop for every possible angle of civic engagement or governance, but with the right approach we can take advantage of what's working and make it scale to address national problems. And that's the kind of widget-making that can help get America going in the right direction again.

0

E-mail sent to Hope Street Group members:

Dear members and supporters,

    Last night's historic election is the beginning of a new era for all of us. It is also the beginning of a lot of hard work. Both candidates ran on platforms acknowledging the tremendous challenges facing the nation's families and economy, and the need to come together to find solutions. Hope Street Group is forging a powerful nonpartisan movement to expand economic opportunity for all Americans and to rebuild our nation's prosperity, and we need you to be a part of it.

    Over the past few years, Hope Street Group has been building bi-partisan consensus for policies that support an Opportunity Economy, where people who work hard and invest in themselves can succeed, and where our nation prospers as a result. From our open source model of policy development to the American Dream Agenda developed at our 2008 Opportunity Economics Colloquium to our work with the Presidential policy advisers for both campaigns on education and health care reform, Hope Street Group has developed a reputation of being a new way of thinking and acting in the policy arena.

    This election demonstrated the power of social media to fundamentally transform the way campaigns are run, providing millions of Americans a new way to be engaged, and we need to make sure that the same opportunities exist post-election. Hope Street Group is hard at work on an exciting new technology platform that will provide our members a way to engage in the policy debate, connecting ideas with the people who can implement them.

    We are asking you to join us in Hope Street Group's next phase, which will provide a place where engaged citizens can work together with key policy makers to promote policies that build an Opportunity Economy. Over the next weeks and months, we will need volunteers to help us organize our 2009 Opportunity Economics Colloquium and to contribute to our policy work on K-12 education reform and health care reform. We need professionals with a background in economics to help us refine and promote our groundbreaking Economic Opportunity Index. We need volunteers who can help us communicate with a broader audience, and who can help us create the next generation of online policy collaboration skills.

    If you would like to be a part of this exciting movement to build an Opportunity Economy, please e-mail your resume to volunteer@hopestreetgroup.org, and put "Volunteer at Hope Street Group" in the subject line.

    Sincerely,

    Monique Nadeau
    Executive Director