Previous Next

Hope Street Group

January 7, 2009
0

At first I thought I was missing something in the details of President-Elect Obama's proposed stimulus plan.  Searching for details on how to spur innovation, especially technological innovation, I came up empty handed. I thought it was a bit strange, but then again, I live in the heart of Silicon Valley, whose raison d'etre is technology and innovation, and where companies live and die by how far ahead of the curve they are.

 

So it was with some relief that I read Janet Rae-Dupree's article giving voice to this precise concern.  Apparently, the details of the stimulus package have not gone unnoticed in these parts, especially the focus on job creation in industries that will help rebuild the nation's infrastructure. Rae-Dupree interviewed a number of Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, who made a strong case for investing in the nation’s digital infrastructure.   Expanding internet access, digitalizing health records, and providing tax credits to companies that innovate technologies in general would be a great place to start.

 

More intriguing, however, is the idea of the government supporting innovation more broadly--technological and otherwise.  This seems essential to restoring America's lead in innovation.  A forward-looking stimulus package will invest not only in restoring our country's crumbling infrastructure, but will also be be (in the words of one of Rae-Dupree's interviewees) "stimovation"-- a stimulus package that rewards innovation.

0

If you've not yet been reduced to instant-messagespeak or simply don't recognize every possible acronym, maybe you don't suffer from "too much information" the way government seems to fear it may.

 

Writing at PBS' MediaShift, Mark Drapeau posts a thorough analysis of the role social media is playing in how officials are dealing with communications, given the explosion of online tools and adoption among their constituencies.

 

I wasn't aware of the dust-up (h/t Drapeau), apparently beginning in the summer of 2008, when a Republican and Democratic congressman each took heat for having utilized services like Twitter (for micro-blogging) and Qik (for mobile video) to speak to their employers, the American people.

 

The hesitation seems understandable (and this story's now a tad dated; last summer seems like one of the 'zoic eras of long ago), but as we careen toward friending the President-elect on Facebook and all that entails, it's helpful to note that this hand-wringing occured during the most recent sessions of Congress.

 

The tension comes from the most delicate matters of public record being balanced with the tremendous scale enabled by the Web.  I'm hoping We the people find the upsides greatly outweigh the downsides.

 

Less than two weeks from the launch of what may be the most interactive government in history, netizens are hopeful the online kinetics of the campaign will translate to better government. But as I've suggested before, time will tell.