0

Bailout on Education?

Posted by Ashley Branca Sep 23, 2008

It would be impossible to exist as a news-conscious citizen in the United States without having heard about and discussed the current financial crisis tearing holes in formerly steadfast and storied banks along the Wall Street corridor. In response, and under great strain and criticism of the court of public opinion, the United States government has provided a $700 billion dollar bailout of the failing institutions with a promise to spend upwards of a trillion dollars to ensure that the nation does not experience another Great Depression.

 

Of course, not a single American has been spared from this economic turmoil, and prices of goods only continue to rise, as do layoffs and debts. This only serves to make me wonder about what aspects of our American existence will be hardest hit in the months following the bailout and surrounding the presidential election. Given that educational initiatives have taken somewhat of a backseat throughout the course of presidential campaigning, I would not be surprised if the candidate’s plans for education reform were the first things to go.

 

Why, you ask? Well, the answer to that is simple. The improvement of education, while certainly an urgent issue, is not the most salient one in the minds of the American people. Why, you ask again? We are inherently shortsighted and accustomed to seeing immediate results. When we press send on an email, we are frustrated to have to wait more than 5 seconds for the correspondence to go through. When we have questions about compelling factual arguments, we can uncover answers within moments by performing a simple Internet search. When we want to speak to a friend or loved one, we have instant access to that person as a result of the prevalence of cell phones.

 

Yet, let’s face it, education is not a game of immediate victories. We test our children and wait for results. We walk our students through various levels of learning, but we must wait and see whether they will graduate, will matriculate to a university, will go on to utilize that knowledge we imparted upon them. Of courese, this entire endeavor is quite expensive, with the annual education budget for education in 2008 equaling 68.6 billion dollars.

 

Depending on the results of the election in November, this number might be even larger. While John McCain’s education platform does not seek to increase the federal budget to expand education initiatives, rather calling for a reallocation of the current budget, Barack Obama has rolled out a completely different plan. Currently, the Illinois senator’s education package calls for an increase in spending on education of 18 billion dollars, monies that would go towards higher pay and recruitment of better quality teachers, the expansion of charter schools, and the expansion of early childhood education through Head Start.

 

This plan, of course, was unveiled months ago, before the largest bailout in American history. So while our candidates are stomping for their election, they are also figuring out how to navigate this badly wounded economy that they will inherit. I wonder, will such domestic spending, as proposed by Obama, be possible now? If education is not an immediate issue to most voters, then it is hard to imagine them holding the candidates accountable for education reform in the face of major economic deficit and downturn.

 

Both candidates have gone on record saying that the bailout was necessary but needs oversight, and both have claimed that this will not hinder their platforms. However, neither Senator Obama nor Senator McCain has chosen to specifically address how the massive transfer of funds will effect the budget for education, perhaps the easiest place for candidates to justify a scaleback. After all, from the political perspective, while the system might be failing, at least everyone has access to education. This is not the case with regards to, say, health care or employment. So with just over 40 days left until the election, I am left wondering how the candidates will be able to deliver on their campaign promises when the fed has just delivered them some hefty financial baggage. I just hope that they are honest with us in advance.

0

Over the course of the last few weeks and months, I have admittedly found myself swept up in the excitement and allure of the 2008 Presidential election. Like a moviegoer enraptured by the thrill and fantasy of a Dreamworks feature, I was glued to my television screen during the conventions, a bowl of popcorn in hand, utterly captivated by the script unfolding before me. The vivid rhetoric rolling off the tongues of our national leaders and echoing through the convention hall allowed me to feel for a moment that I was, in fact, watching something of a dream, or something of, perhaps a fantasy. And this, from both Democrats and Republicans.

 

In the past week, however, as the fireworks and balloons are no longer clouding the air surrounding the presidential platforms, I am beginning to wonder whether I have been duped, whether the Hollywood magic did get me on more time. No, I am not simply trying to allude to Sarah Palin's jab at the Democratic campaign's show-stopping display at Denver's Invesco Field. I am speaking here about a general sense of concern regarding the potential behind each of the candidates' impassioned assertions.

 

Given my background, it is no wonder that I will continue to wonder whether the candidates' education action plans contain any action at all. In his convention speech, Senator Obama claimed that he will allow our nation to "finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education," and that he "will not settle for an America where some kids don't have that chance." The Democratic nominee for president said he plans to "invest in early childhood education," "recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support," to "ask for higher standards and more accountability," and finally to "keep our promise to every young American - if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education." In his voting record, Senator Obama has certainly shown his willingness to provide fiscal resources for education initiatives, and if this is true with regards to early childhood education, the Chicago leader will help the nation's youth to make major gains.

 

While Senator Obama is certainly on the right track with his plan to attract more teachers with higher pay, however, he has not pushed the limits and requirements that would tie teacher pay to teacher performance rather than simply using a traditional credential scale. Unlike Washington D.C.'s chancellor, Michelle Rhee, Obama seems unwilling to address one of the biggest flaws in our system: the unnecessary and harmful protections provided by teachers' unions. In essence, it seems as though Senator Obama has committed to putting more money into the school system as it already is, even as recent reports show a call for increased budget allotments to charter schools.

 

On the other side of the aisle, Republican nominee John McCain has called education the "civil rights issue of this century," stating that competition and choice would be the keys to improvement of our schools. Senator McCain voting on education has been consistent with stance, following the hard line that throwing money into failed systems will only cause more waste, and only in school choice through state-run education will our children succeed. The Republican claims that his plan will do more to shake up education than his opponent's platform, as McCain claims that he intends to get rid of the typical bureaucracy at the helm of education in a system that systematically retains failing teachers in the nation's neediest districts.

 

Unlike Obama's plan, however, McCain's outline does not call for an increase in federal funding for pre-k education, despite the call from reputable sources documenting the importance of such an endeavor. In fact, proving that he is not looking towards newly expanded programs in early childhood education, at least one writer has discovered that most of ideas have already been passed in the most recent Head Start Act reauthorization.

 

Ultimately, though the idealist in me would love to trust every word spoken by our candidates, I am not inclined to do so. Even if the intentions are there, neither Senator Obama nor Senator McCain has provided substantive proof for just how their proposals will improve upon education.  Instead, their rhetoric merely reassures the public that both candidates understand the urgency of the issue but that neither of them will act "too rashly" with the future of America. While there does not have to be one right answer for how we change the educational system, the options must at least provide clear and concise direction for actual results. Neither of the candidates has given us such a blue print, causing at least this one voter to feel that in the game of politics, educational reform is simply a pawn and not the game piece at the center of the action. Thus, opportunities for candidate debate and dialogue regarding their projections for their why, when, and how on education have turned in to personal attacks on each candidate. These are clearly missed opportunities for all of us.

 

As our financial markets continue to fall into disarray, I can only hope that both Senators Obama and McCain will truly get to the root of how we will fix our future through the overhaul of the American educational system, for this truly is our best hope for a prosperous future.